|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64-phys-ma.patch
On 5/12/05, Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> phys is machine physical already. So we shouldn't try to convert guest
> physical to machine physical.
Are you sure that the test a few lines further down shouldn't use (a
to be defined -- see i386) pte_val_ma to compare the currently
installed pte with the to-be-installed one? You might be comparing
random values otherwise...
christian
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> --- a/linux-2.6.11-xen-sparse/arch/xen/x86_64/mm/init.c 2005-05-12 13:23:19
> -07:00
> +++ b/linux-2.6.11-xen-sparse/arch/xen/x86_64/mm/init.c 2005-05-12 13:23:19
> -07:00
> @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@
> }
> }
>
> - new_pte = pfn_pte(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT, prot);
> + new_pte = pfn_pte_ma(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT, prot);
> pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, vaddr);
>
> if (!pte_none(*pte) &&
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|