|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question.	WAS:s
 
 
 
> > I'd vote for expunging CONFIG_SMP.
> 
> I've heard its not uncommon when debugging nasty problems on 
> Linux to turn off SMP as it simplifies the world considerably.
Seting maxcpus=1 has basically the same dynamic effect. The only point
of having the build option is to reduce the number of LOCK'ed
operations.
Ian
 
> I'm not sure this same argument applies to Xen, but there's 
> enough kernel hackers on this list that I thought it would be 
> interesting to open this up for discussion.
> 
> Granted, turning off SMP on Xen/x86 doesn't even compile 
> right now, but that should be fixable.
> 
> So... opinions anyone?  Is keeping CONFIG_SMP (potentially) 
> useful or not?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread> |  
- RE: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question.	WAS:something about ia64 that nobody would read :-),
Ian Pratt <=
  
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |