WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question. WAS: some

To: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question. WAS: something about ia64 that nobody would read :-)
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:46:08 -0700
Delivery-date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:46:06 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcVWYhOb6iQzwhbMQRu/rv1j8qXTbg==
Thread-topic: CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question. WAS: something about ia64 that nobody would read :-)
> From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 

> It's daft that we even have a CONFIG_SMP option in Xen. It spends most
> of its time broken because no-one using x86 builds it, and you won't
> even be able to buy any non SMP hardware before long...
> 
> I'd vote for expunging CONFIG_SMP.

I've heard its not uncommon when debugging nasty problems on Linux
to turn off SMP as it simplifies the world considerably.

I'm not sure this same argument applies to Xen, but there's enough
kernel hackers on this list that I thought it would be interesting
to open this up for discussion.

Granted, turning off SMP on Xen/x86 doesn't even compile right
now, but that should be fixable.

So... opinions anyone?  Is keeping CONFIG_SMP (potentially) useful
or not?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>