Re: [Xen-devel] [RESUBMIT] [PATCH] xen, tools: pincpu use vcpu and cpumap_t

[Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, this patch obviously conflicts with mine. The GETVCPUCONTEXT
patch has not gone in yet, nor have I received feedback. Should I
resolve the conflicts and re-submit?

On 5/11/05, Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/11/05, Mike Wray <mike.wray@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ryan Harper wrote:
> > > * Ryan Harper <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx> [2005-05-10 10:01]:
> > >
> > >>* Mike Wray <mike.wray@xxxxxx> [2005-05-10 09:08]:
> > >>
> > >>>So it looks like we need to try again.
> > >>>Apologies if this is because of changes after
> > >>>you submitted the patch.
> > >>>
> > >>>I also had two failed hunks, which I fixed manually:
> > >>>
> > >>>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file 
> > >>>xen/arch/x86/domain.c.rej
> > >>>1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file 
> > >>>xen/common/dom0_ops.c.rej
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>I'll update it against current unstable and resubmit.  Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > Updated against 2005-05-10 nightly unstable snapshot.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks, I'll apply it.
> 
> I've applied this already -- but it needs some more changes like
> moving the vcpu_to_cpu and cpumap arrays out of getdomaininfo into the
> new getvcpucontext, allowing this to scale beyond MAX_VIRT_CPUS.
> Also, I think sparse vcpu allocations aren't handled right for these
> two arrays, which moving them to getvcpucontext will also fix.
> Patches for this would be highly appreciated!
> 
>     christian
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel