| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] saving domains
> > Well, maybe. While "lighter weight" xend would be good,
> maybe C would
> > be a better implementation language for that lightweight
> tool? Seems
> > like having the fat Python xend implementation use the fat Twisted
> > library makes sense...
>
> Jared, think you meant "little sense" ? ;)
> But otherwise, I agree. Is anyone tied to python as a solution?
> Wouldn't it be better to carve out a more robust alternative
> in C?
There's nothing wrong with using python, its just Twisted that turned
out to be a bad decision. I'd wager that a daemon written in python
using language level threads would be rather smaller (in code size) and
likely more robust than one written in C. I don't really buy the
resource usage argument as a python interpreter is just over 2.5MB RSS
and the daemon shouldn't be CPU intensive.
Ian
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home