On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Jared Rhine wrote:
> I prefer to instead keep the _function_ of daemons to a minimum, and run
> as many purpose-built, lightweight daemons as needed to build the
> functionality I want.
I understand the preference from an esthetics point of view. From a
quantitative performance point of view, in an environment where you want
to minimize the activity that is running on a lightweight cluster node, it
has been shown that 1 is better than 2.
So, all other things being equal, if we can have 1 daemon with TCP sockets
instead of a daemon with unix domain sockets and a daemon that turns that
into TCP sockets, on a reasonably large cluster (1024 or more nodes)
you're much better off with 1 daemon. 1024 node clusters are not uncommon
these days.
Again, this is not an issue of esthetics, it's an issue of measured
performance.
ron
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Home