Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xenctld - a control channel multiplexing daemon

["Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@xxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> Out of curiosity, why is that?  Is it the storage overhead?  Increasing
> the number of processes?  Or simply just the additional administrative
> headache?

more daemons means more things to get run when you least want them to run. 
It's just a good idea to keep the daemons to a minimum. Requiring a daemon 
to translate a unix domain socket to ip just strikes me as very 
unnecessary.

But, I'm not writing it, so past a point I think you should ignore my 
requests if you don't like them :-)

ron


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel