WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen & I/O in clusters - problems! New Information

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen & I/O in clusters - problems! New Information
From: "Mark A. Williamson" <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:40:27 +0100
Cc: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, H�rd Bjerke <Havard.Bjerke@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Rune Johan Andresen <Rune.Johan.Andresen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:56:26 +0100
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1CMsUt-0003lc-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1CMsUt-0003lc-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7
Just a thought: you are using the BVT scheduler, right?  We haven't tested 
performance with the other schedulers recently but we know something goes 
wrong for IO intensive domains on Atropos.

Mark

On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 19:26, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 06:47:35PM +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > > > We tried to compile xen0 with CONFIG_E1000_NAPI = y and got the samre
> > > > results between
> > > > two xen dom0 nodes. I am not sure if these interrupts tells anything:
> > >
> > > It's the different rate at which the eth0 interrupt counts go up
> > > during your bandwidth tests that is interesting. e.g. poll it
> > > once a second during the test.
> >
> > We tried sending 1 MB and measured:
>
> 1MB isn't really very much with a 128KB socket buffer. Do you get
> the same results with larger transfers?
>
> > non-SMP native Linux:
> >  ~ 130k interrupts
> >  114 kB/s
> > native Linux with compiled-in SMP support, single CPU:
> >     ~ 140k interrupts
> >     114 kB/s
> > Xen0:
> >     ~ 180k interrupts
> >     80 kB/s
>
> It's pretty odd that Xen's taking more interrupts. Are you using
> the same native kernel version as you are for Xen?
>
> Also, what happens if you boot xen with 'nosmp' on the Xen
> command line.
>
> We've got Xen tcp performance results from a bunch of machines,
> and dom0 to dom0 performance has always been almost identical to
> native for 1500 byte MTU packets.
>
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
> LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>