|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage
TCP offload helps a lot in the case of iSCSI. You get the ability to
send ~60KB of data at once, and your packets are checksummed for free. I
don't actually know what Linux support for RSS is like but if it is any
good you also get automatic distribution of rx workload across multiple
CPU's too, but that only works if you have multiple TCP connections in
flight at once (eg the multiple LUN scenario).
I don't know what iSCSI offload involves... maybe that can help further.
Offload is great, but it's still TCP. The protocol itself is heavy on
overhead so your 1gbit pipe ends up being, you know, .8gbit storage and
.2gbit protocol (I don't know what the exact numbers are). Offload
keeps this away from your CPUs but doesn't do anything on the pipe
itself. iSCSI's great when you can't afford FC or FCoE (which still
isn't as good as FC) or when you need to do things over a WAN, but it
has its cost.
John
--
John Madden
Sr UNIX Systems Engineer / Office of Technology
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage,
John Madden <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, John Madden
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Eduardo Bragatto
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Eduardo Bragatto
- Re: [Xen-users] BCM5709 iSCSI Offload -- was: Shared Storage, Eduardo Bragatto
- RE: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Bart Coninckx
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Jonathan Dye
|
|
|
|
|