| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26/04/2011 18:53, Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote:
> > more like .96gbit storage and .04gbit protocol.... or .993/.007 on jumbo
> > frames
>
> Are you using TCP and/or iSCSI offload in your NIC? Those seem like pretty
> good numbers.
that's the protocol overhead; what John guessed would be .8/.2 He's
right in that no amount of offloading or CPU power would improve on
that, but his numbers are way off.
--
Javier
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, John Madden
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage,
Javier Guerra Giraldez <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, John Madden
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Eduardo Bragatto
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Eduardo Bragatto
- Re: [Xen-users] BCM5709 iSCSI Offload -- was: Shared Storage, Eduardo Bragatto
- RE: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Bart Coninckx
- Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Jonathan Dye
Re: [Xen-users] Shared Storage, Bart Coninckx
|
|
|
| |
|
Home