|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy 
| 
Hi,
I'll be testing the method also, for different Windows versions, with 
and without memory state backed up. One more question thought ... what 
are the performance and latency aspects of doing a xm save on a Windows 
machine? Does is save only the memory state, or other information 
regarding the state of the machine? 
And one more thing we can test. What about restoring a rdiff backup(+MBR 
backup) to a fresh lvm disk ... maybe it will boot in blue screen, but 
it might work. 
On 02/11/2011 12:36 AM, James Harper wrote:
 
Hi Mike,
agreed. For situations however where data files that are typically
opened with user applications like Word, Excel and other, I think it
might be safe to just snapshot the underlying LVM while the Windows DomU
is running and the users are not accessing the files (typically at
night), mount this and copy from it. I'm actually testing this now. If
there's interest I will post my findings.
B.
 
The Citrix Windows PV drivers include a VSS provider that (I think) allows you 
to ensure that your snapshot is consistent at both a filesystem and application 
level. I've thought about this for GPLPV but have never actually done anything 
about it.
James
 
--
Best regards,
Paul PISCUC
System Administrator - Appnor MSP S.A.
US: (+1) 650 336 57 50
RO: (+4) 021 569 46 56
http://www.appnor.com
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, (continued)
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Paul Piscuc
[Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Guido Hecken
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Paul PISCUC
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Bart Coninckx
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Mike Sun
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Bart Coninckx
RE: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, James Harper
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy,
Paul Piscuc <=
[Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Guido Hecken
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Bart Coninckx
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Paul Piscuc
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Fajar A. Nugraha
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Bart Coninckx
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Fajar A. Nugraha
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Mike Sun
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Fajar A. Nugraha
RE: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, James Harper
Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy, Mike Sun
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |