WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy

To: Bart Coninckx <bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Backup running Windows machines - redundancy
From: Mike Sun <msun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:36:16 -0500
Cc: Paul PISCUC <paul.piscuc@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guido Hecken <guido.hecken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:37:16 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2iH2zRlr9vKuq+sQgLDg2Wb5bykV98NDRuiDQK2wk7w=; b=oJlq1Y84b24X20iyK2by6ulTEfpchxtCLizB41/0t68Tu5FooFFpwB+URA08B4OOo7 FBHM7WsGjlZtXP1Stt1RBLFML+gCf2fhxI8LULES08eX9r3eOf7An1bsVCLG1k4rgV7N +qLs6VElAYsjk66LltXENsiKrXw3GfNsIAbEk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=DJ73llvadN3it1TLvEdS+Y2M1TPMchDS6wpdzXvgmojwkxlicDE+yQ6aVtO0CGsTG/ w9B476XVkiNy2Atr1ygZG5GiCbBuw7+1ln8Rob1lWafyElwC5KD4ahIvBvRyCG9KGXqf pxk263Wp+Rxxq46W7X6lAqxCeJ7XlW46XLYC4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D53F0C3.8050108@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <889950206.4537831297249585810.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D531B75.50209@xxxxxxxxxx> <FB8F9F087039D8499E37A3F706D5EE160D6CAE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimr_SyX-qdWoA_=gw0TuqsoQtsDd5=FEVsnieDQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D53F0C3.8050108@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Bart,

> That's what I actually suggested in previous post: do a xm save -f, take
> a snapshot of the underlying LV, do a xm restore and then dd the snapshot.
> This is 100% safe for restore if you also backup the memory state file.

You're right, it's only 100% safe if you backup the *memory* state as
well.  Otherwise, from all the other proposed methods I've seen in
this thread, just by pausing or saving the VM does not guarantee that
the file system will be put into a consistent state, which is
important for those who care about file system backups and not VM
snapshots.

Mike

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>