WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 vs 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 on debian

To: Israel Garcia <igalvarez@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 vs 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 on debian
From: Tapas Mishra <mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 13:02:19 +0530
Cc: Xen Users <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:33:48 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mNU6w6BrqdBg68BUTo6YUDZ8PG4Oa0kVJ7g6IdONfvw=; b=pFCDRY0Jkzz7F6yWKq+JPObu2YAQAVeXOUQa9U5efaZ0KOR0BA6nkHw1lcbta821sh CdleQSfrGThbwZEMk7DMIGG/rOQRXcZLe05sFJyJRv4UKyPceu5fcUukuBRxjOrTHrru RMgMPUo22KbbjFYS2imqHkjTj/Gp+wbhFT8hY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=lHBmP0xHGNkPIzzrVLV3vQ12BeYU/W/Q9a67uElo0SczD73MPEaA1RAqHWftqXovg3 sZ7pboWULwel2ucI3LgPHPk301XoijyjvloD2kfF6MTtWFlsSc0J36zXlrDjH9tiWrjT fhV4u+N+i0LrSMh1/90C4oV29kHPOjnjudCUQ=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTikg4DRnftEbKf18pGgeBbqNaDoAZh4jqTSBJ6JX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTinXmOuX3UCXRkBolgCbDIkk4uzbhJrlOErTBfAF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikhe31DQOx_UKesgBjm_9eZaW-ggW9Uqd0IZWQc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikg4DRnftEbKf18pGgeBbqNaDoAZh4jqTSBJ6JX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Israel Garcia <igalvarez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Tapas Mishra <mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From my experience I tell it will be better to use a newer version.A
>> day before yesterday my xen daemon failed to start.I am still tracing
>> it as what went wrong.Better use the xen-4 and compile the binary if
>> you want to use the latest version it will be better than what you
>> mentioned.
> Hi Tapas,
>
> So, you recommend me to install a fresh up2date debian without any of
> this xen kernel,
No not this.
>download xen-4 and compile it?
Just compile the latest hypervisor xen 4.0
this is the latest one and has a lot of things patched and supported.



-- 
Tapas

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>