|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 vs 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 on debian
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Tapas Mishra <mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From my experience I tell it will be better to use a newer version.A
> day before yesterday my xen daemon failed to start.I am still tracing
> it as what went wrong.Better use the xen-4 and compile the binary if
> you want to use the latest version it will be better than what you
> mentioned.
Hi Tapas,
So, you recommend me to install a fresh up2date debian without any of
this xen kernel, download xen-4 and compile it? Is this better than
used the latest kernel debian lenny brings from repos
(2.6.26-[1][2]-xen-amd64)?
I appreciate any information, experience about this of you guys.
thanks
regards
Israel.
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Israel Garcia <igalvarez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Where can I find the pros, cons of using any of this kernels? Is it
>> recommendable to use 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64? Better performance? More
>> stable than 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64?
>>
>> --
>> Regards;
>> Israel Garcia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tapas
>
--
Regards;
Israel Garcia
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|