Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Tim Kaufmann <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Conclusion: There's a problem in the gplpv scsi and/or vbd drivers and/or in
> the combination of those with my Xen-Setup. What can I do now?

It IS possible that the new GPLPV version has new bugs in them. In
that case James usually wants to know:
- What OS and Xen version, installed from packaged or self-compiled
(this is a new thread, so you should also post the info here)
- did you try Linux HVM with PV drivers? How is disk and network
performance there?

Worth to try:
- try older version :
http://meadowcourt.org/downloads/Xen%20PV%20Drivers%200.9.12-pre13.exe
- try /PATCHTPR :
http://www.nabble.com/New-version-of-GPL-PV-drivers-for-Windows-0.10.0.47-td22867090.html
- testing Windows2003

I'm still using 0.9.12-pre13 with both Windows 2003 and XP, both worked great.

Regards,

Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Tim Kaufmann Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Thomas Goirand Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Fajar A. Nugraha Message not available Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Fajar A. Nugraha Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Tim Kaufmann Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Tim Kaufmann Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Tom Brown Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Tim Kaufmann Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Fajar A. Nugraha Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?), Tim Kaufmann Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?), Fajar A. Nugraha <= Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?), Tim Kaufmann Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?), Fajar A. Nugraha Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?), Vladislav Karpenko Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?), Fajar A. Nugraha Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?), Vladislav Karpenko Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?), Fajar A. Nugraha Message not available [Xen-users] Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP, Fajar A. Nugraha [Xen-users] Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP, Tim Kaufmann [Xen-users] Dom U stuck at boot time- centos.5-2 domU image on RHEL5 dom0!, Ata E Husain Bohra Re: [Xen-users] Dom U stuck at boot time- centos.5-2 domU image on RHEL5 dom0!, Fajar A. Nugraha

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: Problem with gplpv under Windows XP (was: Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM re