 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container? |
|---|---|
| From: | Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:15:29 +0800 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:16:18 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id: date:from:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to: content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns/txt; s=postfix; bh= 3Bbadkub7gDxP2Mh29EtH1eExD0=; b=uFJXhCNJpvBBBlAsC0xVcMHynpzVzLQh QWuxkYH1DHdgMAmXzl6zd+55Owt6h6jl7NxwHQBH7SPNInchT3MRnwUp/txSd+Em MTQxeiBKqu/cuWr71cWIdBm3QWI2CCQ6PijJXY9/ULp4yHX1esKYycXZ7KJGKPSf Uwyj2iralAM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=postfix; b= V+YwBg86/utj8JSojGdChmH9c7R53HmyrUJ9ZfUR9SGR/9Y9WHGGtaC1c9ZIjrEh XKemC2m7/8k2DwDQYZTg08RiF5UyafLX21xl3alPTP5wNdNRmgDXueB9RtpTgVJS flOxCwOJmUN2BiHEhcUaGMZ8g6sWKcDvqKMnPanebZY= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1290A483-6F28-41F8-BAB2-F5C29F7C3160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Openpgp: | id=98EF9A49 |
| Organization: | GPLHost |
| References: | <1290A483-6F28-41F8-BAB2-F5C29F7C3160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) |
Tim Kaufmann wrote: > Hi, > > I installed Windows XP SP3 to two domU. Only difference between them: > one is stored in a container (let's call it domU1), while the other one > (domU2) is stored on a logical volume made available by the dom0. > > I have a tar.gz-file which is 400 MB in size. Copying this file from a > samba server on the network via LAN to domU1 takes 11 seconds on domU1 > and a little more than 2 minutes on domU2. > > Creating a local copy of the file takes 3 seconds on domU1 and 80 > seconds on domU2. Is that a penalty LVM-users have to live with or is > something wrong with my system? > > Tim No, LVM are actually a lot faster than file loopbacks. I don't get why you are having such results. Did you install the GPLPV drivers on both instance? Thomas _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Tim Kaufmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Fajar A. Nugraha |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Tim Kaufmann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?, Fajar A. Nugraha |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
