WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] GPLPV network performance

To: "Steve Thompson" <smt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Grant McWilliams" <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] GPLPV network performance
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:41:13 +1100
Cc: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:42:25 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.0.9999.0901191415180.22762@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.LRH.0.9999.0901171121470.20983@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><alpine.LRH.0.9999.0901171409450.23182@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><4972F31A.6080604@xxxxxxxxx><AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D015503D2@trantor><7207d96f0901180448y64ed670aned164a750624c597@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D015503E0@trantor><4973E895.7060403@xxxxxxxxx> <49740F17.4040805@xxxxxxxxx><ed123fa30901182255h30f19455kf92aed5e408d7e8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><alpine.LRH.0.9999.0901190951230.1854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><ed123fa30901191032l48956a98yb6f60b5eef1ba005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LRH.0.9999.0901191415180.22762@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acl6aynysOYl7EnFRQ6qMFiEmzoYNwAI/Ksw
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] GPLPV network performance
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Grant McWilliams wrote:
> 
> > It seems the speed issues are with data entering the DomU and not
> > actually DomU to DomU performance. Can you guys test Dom0 to DomU
speed
> > instead of the other way around.
> 
> Dom0 2.33 GHz Intel Core2, CentOS 5.2, xen 3.0.3, GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13:
> 
> Windows XP SP3:
>       server=Dom0 client=DomU 702 Mbits/sec
>       server=DomU client=Dom0 667 Mbits/sec (5% slower)
> 
> Windows 2003 SP2:
>       server=Dom0 client=DomU 1.02 Gbits/sec
>       server=DomU client=Dom0 719 Mbits/sec (29% slower)

Just FYI, the reason for the performance drop in the domU RX path is
that Windows doesn't support some of the offload functions that Linux
does, so I have to emulate them which has some pretty high overhead,
mostly related to packet copying.

In fact in the RX path, there is quite a lot of copying going on and
there is definitely room for improvement, but it will never be as good
as TX.

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>