Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance

[Thomas Halinka <lists@xxxxxxxxx>]

Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 17:13 +0100 schrieb Guillaume:
> 2008/11/28 Guillaume <guillaume.chardin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > 2008/11/28 Stefan de Konink <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote:
> >>
> >> > Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 16:22 +0100 schrieb Stefan de Konink:
> >> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a
> >> > > > GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage!
> >> > >
> >> > > My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the 
> >> > > links
> >> > > 10GE ->  1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance.
> >> >
> >> > A GBit-Link has a maximum throughput of 110 MB/s and you really got
> >> > about 100 MB/s? ;)
> >>
> >> NetApp is fast...Solaris too if it has enough disk;)
> >>
> >>
> >> Stefan
> Hey, i'd never thinking that my thread will bring so much ppl !!

:D

> 
>  And about phy:// and disk:// :) which one is the best ?

phy!

>  (was original
> question :] not SAN, FC and other ! but interresting)

;)

> 
> 
> 
> --
> Guillaume

Thomas


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users