 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
| To: | Thomas Halinka <lists@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance |
| From: | Stefan de Konink <stefan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:22:48 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | Guillaume <guillaume.chardin@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefan de Konink <stefan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:23:28 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1227885339.25974.34.camel@ubu32> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote: > i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a > GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage! My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the links 10GE -> 1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance. > Why is FC faster than iSCSI? Ah, it s because of the protocol. Non-sence. > > and preferably stability comparisons. > > open-iscsi has no stable releases yet. aoetools do have. There are also > many users complaining about iscsi-kernel-issues.... ...there is more than open-iscsi, in targets and initiators. (+ OS'es) Stefan _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
