Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance

On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote:

> Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 10:54 +0100 schrieb Stefan de Konink:
> > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Guillaume wrote:
> >
> > > I ask me some questions about xen disk backend performance. What is the
> > > better backend to use to have the best ones.
> > >
> > > For me I tought its better to use phy: than disk: , because it's does'nt
> > > need "encapsulation" to store data in and so, writing data is quicker. But
> > > maybe i'm wrong.
> > > Maybe some of you can give advise and more info about that !
> >
> > iSCSI + pvSCSI seems to be optimal I guess.
>
>
> iSCSI is pretty slow, because of all the tcp-ip overhead. Try AoE since
> its Layer 2 (Ethernet)

Please come with benchmarks, and preferably stability comparisons. Never
the less, AoE would still process on dom0, while pvSCSI is directly done
on the domU.

Stefan


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Guest - slow response to keystroke (SOLVED), Stephen Liu

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Guest - slow response to keystroke (SOLVED), Thomas Halinka

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]