|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] Re: Windows Disk performance
Ruslan Sivak schrieb:
I'm using a 3ware 9650 with 4 10k VelociRaptors in raid 5. I doubt that
it's reading out of cache, I'm probably getting sequential reads from
the outside of the disks with readahead and all that fun stuff.
Russ,
if you are talking about getting max speed out of a 3Ware including
optimizing read-ahead and caching/buffering that's fine, but you started
the topic comparing dom0 vs domU performance and asking if your testing
method is flawed... it is!
hdparm will give you a nice output, but that has nothing in common with
real throughput that you will get when running tools like bonnie++,
iozone or iometer.
The theoretical maximum I would expect from your setup is something
between 200-240MB/s sustained read transfer rate and 150-180MB/s write
transfer rate.
But transfer rate is not everything, when talking about performance you
may want to look for I/O operations per second.
I would strongly suggest that you use the exact same tools in dom0 and
domU to measure their performance difference and only compare that if
you interesting in any domU/GPLPV vs. domU/stock vs. dom0 performance
conclusions.
That being said, I'm very interested in the results, I will also do some
testing with iometer in dom0 and domU, PV and HVM (stock and GPLPV),
maybe we can ask the community for some feedback regarding common
iometer test parameters that we should use and then gather the results
to get ideas.
Best regards,
Christian
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- RE: [Xen-users] Windows Disk performance, (continued)
|
|
|
|
|