This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Release 0.8.9 of GPL PV drivers for Windows

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Release 0.8.9 of GPL PV drivers for Windows
From: jim burns <jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:21:17 -0400
Delivery-date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:21:55 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D013DC578@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D013DC578@trantor> (sfid-20080426_031613_704812_AB7C52C9)
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9
On Saturday April 26 2008 02:49:59 am James Harper wrote:
> I did have a test performance of 2.5Gbits/second, but now that I have to
> copy the windows buffers into my own buffers to reduce page usage, I
> seem to only be able to get about 1.5Gbits/second out of it... This kind
> of makes sense given that DomU to Dom0 network performance is going to
> be CPU and Memory bandwidth bound.

What was the downside of the higher page usage?

Looking forward to testing it (or at least loading it :-).

Xen-users mailing list