On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:22:55AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:21:41PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:30:51PM +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> > >
> > > If someone knows a Windows Benchmarking Suite, I'll do real tests. I know
> > > my
> > > recent tests are not comparable to any value, but I'm a little bit
> > > handycapped
> > > on windows ;)
> > >
> >
> > You could use IOmeter http://www.iometer.org. It's a widely used disk
> > benchmarking tool on Windows.
> >
> > It's easy to run benchmarks using different requests sizes, different number
> > of outstanding io's etc..
> >
>
> With small requests sizes (512 bytes or 4k) you can measure how many IOPS
> (IO operations per second) you can get, and with big request sizes (64+ kB)
> you can measure how much throughput you can get..
>
> Changing the number of outstanding IO's means how many IO operations are
> active at the same time (optimal values depends on the storage used, and on
> the queue depth of the hardware, drivers and kernel).
>
> Note that IOmeter wants to use raw disk devices, so don't create any
> partitions or format the disk before using IOmeter.
>
And please share your benchmarking results :)
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home