This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Which Debian version? Which xen version?

To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Which Debian version? Which xen version?
From: "Arie Goldfeld" <arik.goldfeld@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:31:41 +0200
Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:32:29 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=esg9oMmYqBNVwPzqpdwDcLmC0fdx4JK5L2M6CNyKkLA=; b=wgrCF8xkEf+174FYB5dOTXxgLuGP+lMO5hrC9wqYwDw89gET+t4JktLZ97LEK5kW71XdDm5RTl5uZTn7SOGqwoOxfMq/5nGn5LzeqW8bhQk6igz+7LngFtW1v+b8AdKfV2NpXYOYAhK6YUaTB/r7fTubI3qUD7nk9CN5aPmFcec=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=chMzQx5lVoNFiUJo3OpQ4QY8iYytwHigM2e044rKRZ0tghmEOpO5b1dU1Fr9pdGLCwGLMDyALMeAnHuspIgs7MlfoT23BeANkRb1jlp4QXaQuzv6oAF3exsi8+OiXSBPpIA3rcyoASYUx1OqzglKn4GNAwguZr/ybq2ic7zwZWw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4754B2E7.9070706@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4753E004.9050002@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4754019B.1080507@xxxxxxx> <4754B2E7.9070706@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have Debian Etch on x86_64 and Xen 3.1 compliled from source. It runs OK, except for the problem I reported in my previous post: I can't run more than 80 domains because of a limitation, which is unclear to me.

On 12/4/07, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bas van der Vlies wrote:
> Jan Marquardt wrote:
>> Hi list,
>> I need an advice on the both mentioned above topics. We will start using
>> Xen to replace some older servers. We are thinking about the following
>> possible combinations:
>> 1. Debian Etch with Xen 3.0 from Debian packages.
>> 2. Debian Etch with Xen 3.1 from Source
>> 3. Debian Lenny with Xen 3.1 from packages.
> I had the same procedure and ended up with Etch and building the
> kernel and utils from source Xen 3.1.1.
> Because 3.1.1 version has some improvements over version 3.0.4 for etch.

I don't use Debian, but from my experince using vendor-supported Xen
often saves a lot of headaches. I use RHEL 5.1 with bundled xen 3.1 (rpm
version still says 3.0 though), and the upgrade process from RHEL 5 ->
5.1 which includes xen 3->3.1 has been relatively smooth. Xen 3.1 is a
great improvement for me because it has 32-on-64 support and allows
running Opensolaris PV on linux.

If you like Debian, why not try Ubuntu Gutsy? It comes with Xen 3.1.



Xen-users mailing list

Xen-users mailing list