WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] network IO dom0 and domU comparison

To: <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] network IO dom0 and domU comparison
From: "Larry Ludwig" <larrylud@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:45:05 -0400
Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:44:29 -0700
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole; b=D5gdYt5pVnPiLnNHyUkSmkn2SBV5RQ5C5+SdtGu504GkY/dDbi9hUKCdIvMckskFqHPvthyW0MytJ6FPfHuGfLZQVtHrWML4l95hjCPShzzMzKTzW/knpalbPQtc9rJrXjUR5yPhzJ2Xjue0oovpp49aAgcBMF8Ya4pm0cGA+6U=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole; b=WS1XEKQlgPWHRSxK4saMQzTvswDrs0A02yy1pWEATHNREL95PZ9feHw5lpowMsdhNyTbSA26JDjg7JQ9r9v2vMY+AveANDDUdA5Iq7CmJDeFp4Rk0obw3n1rTZoQdHy/GysswlnJ/FqAJ+EI7uHA+SqMdpClGUkCWMLP+jsgd8g=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AceHULGyZ65T+GZRTqyANVPXyUZOqA==
Not what I was expecting with dom0 and domU performance difference.  The network is 100Mbit using sftp to transfer the file.  domU doesn't have iptables enabled in this test.  I assume the xennet driver for domU has some room for improvement?  Is this performance expected in a domU?
 
dom0
/home/samba/software/windows/mspublisher2003.zip                                                  100%  179MB   8.5MB/s   00:21
 
domU - dom0 iptables on
/home/samba/software/windows/mspublisher2003.zip                                                  100%  179MB   6.2MB/s   00:29
 
domU - dom0 iptables off
/home/samba/software/windows/mspublisher2003.zip                                                  100%  179MB   6.9MB/s   00:26   
 
-L
 
--
Larry Ludwig
Empowering Media
1-866-792-0489 x600
Have you visited our customer service blog?
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-users] network IO dom0 and domU comparison, Larry Ludwig <=