|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Virtualization over CLIENTS/SLED
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of anant
> Sent: 24 January 2007 09:15
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Virtualization over CLIENTS/SLED
>
>
> do some research dude....
> or ill give a hint.... SLES -> SuSE linux enterprise
> server...this is server
> based distro....and if ull see SLED ->SuSE linux enterprise
> desktop......and
> this is cleint based distro....
> So now you have to look for other distro.. and let me knw
> what you find
> out....like are dey client based and support XEN and openWBEM
> or not...?
> ok all the best
Do you know something? Your attitude doesn't exactly encourage people
responding to your mails, does it?
You ask "Any comments guys", and Nico explains that SOME distributors
doesn't do distinct server/desktop releases, but rather one combined set
of software, which contains both the Desktop and the Server software
within one set of media (CDs, DVDs, etc). Whether those include {Xen,
openWBEM} or not would depend on whether the distributor thinks that is
a useful thing to include. Obviously, such a distribution is neither
"Client/Desktop" nor is it a "Server" distribution, so you can't say
that it's one or the other - it's just a distribution of Linux-based
software, so your question "are they client based" isn't really
relevant, as there's no such distinction in this case.
Most distributions will publish a list of all the software they
distribute, so it shouldn't be hard for YOU to find out what's included
in which distribution.
One thing I can't really understand is what you're actualy trying to
achieve - it is often better to explain more about what you're trying to
achieve before you post fairly open questions to the list. The more
information you can supply, the more direct the answer can be made.
--
Mats
>
> Nico Kadel-Garcia-2 wrote:
> >
> > anant wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> Will virtualization/xen gonna be possible over client side
> as i guess
> >> till
> >> now it is included only with SERVER OS.
> >> Any comments guys
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> > Define a SERVER OS, please. Debian, Fedora Core, CentOS,
> Gentoo, and
> > numerous other distributions don't really have the concept. Those
> > companies that do support such a concept want to charge you
> for that
> > kind of support, because the engineers and managers they
> hire to support
> > it need to be paid.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Virtualization-over-CLIENTS-SLED-tf30642
> 90.html#a8557151
> Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|