| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Compile error 3.0.3 - vnc.c auf Debian Sarge
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> bigfoot29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 19 October 2006 17:42
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Compile error 3.0.3 - vnc.c auf Debian Sarge
>
>
> > [snip a huge bunch of error messages]
> >> Now there are 2 questions:
> >> 1) The system is a Celeron 700 - so I don't need the HVM
> >> things including
> >> vnc and sdl. Is there a way to disable these options?
> >
> > Correct, you don't need them. I don't think there's any
> simple way to
> > remove them tho'. (You could of coruse just remove the
> relevant section
> > in the makefile in ${xenroot}/tools and it won't try to build those
> > bits.
>
> Maybe its a small suggestion then to insert an if-clause that
> looks for
> these files - and in case they are not included just print a
> warning or
> error message saying that hvm cannot be used because of
> missing files? :)
>
>
> >> 2) Why do I get this compile error? Looks like he can't find
> >> "X11/keysymdef.h" - but even a "locate X11" didn't show
> the files... I
> >> wonder why they are required by now - and not optional any
> >> more like they
> >> were with 3.0.2 :(
> >
> > You need to install xorg-x11-devel or some such package
> (which probably
> > also means that you need to instal three or more other
> packages to make
> > that install... :-( )
>
> "apt-get install libx11-dev" brought me that missing file.
> Its compiling
> right now... - but as said, I wonder why I was able to
> compile 3.0.2, but
> not 3.0.3 :D
> In case you don't hear any more riots from me, this package
> (included 3-4
> more dependencies) fixed the problem and it compiled well. :)
Inbetween 3.0.2 and 3.0.3 (exactly in ChangeSet 10742 of unstable: Add
access to monitor vt over VNC, Recognise Ctrl-Alt-1/2/3...) This change
added this dependancy on x11-devel package...
>
>
> > Hmm. If it takes 8 hours to compile, maybe you should
> consider getting a
> > faster machine. It takes my machine roughly an hour to build all the
> > necessary bits for a Xen installation - and that includes
> the time it
> > takes to download the linux kernel source...
>
> With my A64 X2 it does also take me not more than an hour,
> but I do only
> have that Celeron to mess around with. Its also my home server with 3
> running domains. Firewall, webserver/mailserver and a
> fileserver for the
> private net at home. - enough RAM involved everything seems
> to be fine.
> Its slow, but its working. :D The default kernel compile time
> took that
> long.
But you can build on the Athlon64 X2 machine, and copy the install
directory to the "play machine"... This is what I'm doing, as I don't
want to loose all my source-changes when (undoubtedly) the AMD-V machine
crashes because I've done something stupid in the hypervisor... Crashing
an ext2/ext3 disk many enough times will eventually cause an
unrepairable disk error and everything will be a mess... :-( So I use a
different machine to build/download the source code, and copy it acroess
when I've built it - I even wrote a little script to do that and reboot
the remote machine...
--
Mats
>
> For now: Thanks for the help!
>
> >
> > --
> > Mats
>
> Regards, Bigfoot29
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home