Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU

["Chris Fanning" <christopher.fanning@xxxxxxxxx>]

> http://stateless.geek.nz/2005/08/29/xen-disk-performance/
thanks for the insight Nicholas.

So, would you say that any file sharing (smb for example) might be
better on dom0?

Chris.

On 2/18/06, Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 18/02/06, Richard Jones <rich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > You're right and it is a single processor machine.  I'm not expecting
> > blazing performance (we far prefer reliability / predictability).
> > It's just really is quite slow at the moment and I'm sure that it's
> > down to some sort of configuration mistake.
>
> I thought the same thing, but two processors didn't seem to solve this for
> me when I was running something similar with 2.0. Moving the NFS to host0
> seemed to be the solution. I didn't try running the NFS server with a  dom0
> kernel. That might be worth trying.
>
> http://stateless.geek.nz/2005/08/29/xen-disk-performance/
>
>
> --
> Nicholas Lee
> http://stateless.geek.nz
> gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users