xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU
On 18/02/06, Richard Jones <rich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You're right and it is a single processor machine. I'm not expecting blazing performance (we far prefer reliability / predictability). It's just really is quite slow at the moment and I'm sure that it's down to some sort of configuration mistake.
I thought the same thing, but two processors didn't seem to solve this for me when I was running something similar with 2.0. Moving the NFS to host0 seemed to be the solution. I didn't try running the NFS server with a dom0 kernel. That might be worth trying.
http://stateless.geek.nz/2005/08/29/xen-disk-performance/ -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU, Richard Jones
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU, Markus Hochholdinger
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU, Arie Kraai
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU, Ceri Storey
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU, Richard Jones |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Xen-users] mkinitrd -o /boot/xen-modules-2.6.12.6-xen 2.6.12.6-xen, Andrew Thompson |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU, Richard Jones |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU, Chris Fanning |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|