WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: Spam:*, [Xen-users] Xen questions - Swap, networking and errors

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Spam:*, [Xen-users] Xen questions - Swap, networking and errors
From: Daniel Lang <dlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:23:22 -0400
Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:22:10 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42CC94B5.6010206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <42CC2A3D.6090303@xxxxxxxxxx> <42CC94B5.6010206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050623)
Marcus Brown wrote:
> 
> Daniel Lang wrote:
> 
> 
>>1)When I boot xen0, the specified amount of RAM shows up in top
>>correctly, but the swap partitions I have are not activated.  When I
>>attempt to activate swap myself, I recieve the following error message:
>>      xen:/# swapon /dev/hde2
>>      swapon: /dev/hde2: No such device or address
>>The server has a mirrored RAID1 setup, and both MD devices are detected
>>and mounted properly.  However, I am confused about why the kernel does
>>not see the hard disk partitions themselves.  The disks are SATA drives,
>>and so at first I thought perhaps it didn't recongize the drives, but if
>>that were the case, I don't think either MD device would be detected
>>properly.  Is there a boot option that I have not seen to address this
>>issue?
>>
> 
> Make sure the device exists with #fdisk -l /dev/hde
> I guess it's possible that your drives are now allocated a different node.
> On your original kernel, it would appear from what you're saying,
> that your SATA drives all came up as hdX.
> However, on you dom0 kernel, they are sdX.
> 

Yes, I discovered this.  Thank you pointing it out.

> 
>>As a side note, what is a proper amount of RAM needed for xen0?  I have
>>not found any documentation really stating how much RAM is need for the
>>priveledged Xen instance.  The server itself has 4GB of RAM.  Should
>>xen0 have all 4GB of RAM to partition to the xenU domains?
>> 
>>
> 
> The kernel stanza in grub's menu.lst specifies the amount of memory for
> dom0 to use, not how much it has to share. I'm not certain about the actual
> memory overheads involved in running domains, but I've found that 128MB
> is more than enough to run a couple of domains, NFS server, etc.
> 
> 
>>2)With the default xend config, when I start xend the bridge device
>>xen-br0 is created.  However, after that I lose all network activity to
>>xen0.  I noticed that no vif devices were created, only xen-br0.
>>Initially, xen-br0 doesn't have an IP.  I've tried setting it to the IP
>>of eth0, and a 192.168.0.x IP, but I still cannot get networking up.
>>
>>I changed the xend config to use the network-route rather than network,
>>and when I start xend, networking doesn't go down, but xen-br0 is not
>>created.  I am not sure why the default network config is not working.
>>Do I need to make changes to the routing tables?
>> 
>>
> 
> I initially had this problem too, and like you, I switched to routing
> until I
> got everything else working and realised that routing just didn't cut it!
> I'd suggest you get everything else going first.
> 

I've got the test domain running now, and networking for xenU doesn't
seem to work.  Here is the current output from ifconfig:

xen:~# ifconfig
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0E:0C:3D:C2:7F
          inet addr:204.225.94.83  Bcast:204.225.94.127
Mask:255.255.255.192
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:121293 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:52205 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:8393755 (8.0 MiB)  TX bytes:4168294 (3.9 MiB)
          Base address:0xec00 Memory:defa0000-defc0000

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:3494 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:3494 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:296403 (289.4 KiB)  TX bytes:296403 (289.4 KiB)

vif3.0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
          inet addr:169.254.1.0  Bcast:169.254.255.255  Mask:255.255.255.255
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:462 (462.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

Is the network settings for vif3.0 the result of the not configuring the
vif variable in my xenU config?  I am hesitant specifying a mac address
as I'm afraid of fubar'ing something.

> [snip]
> 
> 
>>disk = [ 'file:/clients/test/root_fs,sda1,w', 
>>'file:/clients/test/swap_fs,sda2,w' ]
>> 
>>
> 
> [snip]
> 
> 
>># Set root device.
>>root = "/dev/hda1 ro"
>> 
>>
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Your root device seems incorrectly set. Your device export line suggests
> that the line should be:
> root = "/dev/sda1 ro"
> 

Aww! Yes this was it.  I always seem to miss some mundane detail such as
that.  Thank you for being an extra set of eyes.

> 
> Hope that helps, and good luck :)
> 

Thanks for the help so far.

> Marcus.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


-- 
Daniel Lang

Systems Administrator
SevenL Networks
416.642.1235
1.866.639.5123

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>