On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 01:41:30AM +0200, Olivier B. wrote:
> On 27/09/2011 21:35, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:28:08AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Attached is the fix, verified in our env.
> >>
> >>So.. you are asking for this upstream git commit to be back-ported
> >>to 2.6.32, right?
> >
> >I'm curious --- is there a good reason why Xen users are using an
> >upstream 2.6.32 kernel? If they are using a distro kernel, fine, but
> >then the distro kernel should be providing the support. But at this
> >point, 2.6.32 is so positively *ancient* that, I'm personally not
> >interesting in providing free, unpaid distro support for users who
> >aren't willing to either (a) pay $$$ and get a supported distro
> >kernel, or (b) use a much more modern kernel. At this point, Guest
> >and Host Xen support is available in 3.0 kernels, so there's really no
> >excuse, right?
> >
> > - Ted
> >
>
> In my case, for Dom0 I use the 2.6.32 kernel from my distrib, because it's
> stable.
> I have stability problems with the kernel 3.0 on Dom0, and as I haven't
> physical access neither kvm or serial port, I don't know what to report... It
> just hang randomly, without any line in logs.
No physical access? No IPMI? No SOL?
>
> Does the Xen support on 3.0 kernels should be considered stable ?
Yes - it should be considered stable (3.0.4 at least, with one particular
patch that is going in 3.0.5: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/2/114).
Please help me find whatever is causing your crash.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home