| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: ext4 BUG in dom0 Kernel 2.6.32.36
----------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:55:02 -0700
> From: jeremy@xxxxxxxx
> To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: ext4 BUG in dom0 Kernel 2.6.32.36
>
> On 09/06/2011 08:11 AM, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:53:47 -0400
> > > From: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > CC: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > jeremy@xxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: ext4 BUG in dom0 Kernel 2.6.32.36
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:24:14PM +0800, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi:
> > > >
> > > > I've met an ext4 Bug in dom0 kernel 2.6.32.36. (See kernel stack
> > below)
> > >
> > > Did you try the 3.0 kernel?
> > No, I am afried the change would be to much for our current env.
> > May result in other stable issue.
> > So, I want to dig out what really happen. Hopes.
>
> Another question is whether this is a regression compared to earlier
> versions of 2.6.32? Do you know if this problem exists in a non-Xen
> environment?
>
There are some others reports this issue in non-xen env.
http://markmail.org/message/ywr4nfgiuvgdcr7y
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg21066.html
The difficulty is I haven't find a efficient way to reproduce it.
(Currently it only show in our cluster, redeploy our cluster may cost 3days
more. )
> Thanks,
> J
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home