Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] ext4-fix-dirty-extent-when-origin-leaf-extent-reac.patch

["Olivier B." <xen.list@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 27/09/2011 21:35, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:28:08AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > >     Attached is the fix, verified in our env.
> > So.. you are asking for this upstream git commit to be back-ported
> > to 2.6.32, right?
> I'm curious --- is there a good reason why Xen users are using an
> upstream 2.6.32 kernel?  If they are using a distro kernel, fine, but
> then the distro kernel should be providing the support.  But at this
> point, 2.6.32 is so positively *ancient* that, I'm personally not
> interesting in providing free, unpaid distro support for users who
> aren't willing to either (a) pay $$$ and get a supported distro
> kernel, or (b) use a much more modern kernel.  At this point, Guest
> and Host Xen support is available in 3.0 kernels, so there's really no
> excuse, right?
>
>                                                 - Ted
In my case, for Dom0 I use the 2.6.32 kernel from my distrib, because it's 
stable.
I have stability problems with the kernel 3.0 on Dom0, and as I haven't 
physical access neither kvm or serial port, I don't know what to report... It 
just hang randomly, without any line in logs.

Does the Xen support on 3.0 kernels should be considered stable ?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel