 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL
| To: | Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL |
| From: | Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 May 2011 14:59:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 23 May 2011 06:01:58 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1306155551; l=493; s=domk; d=aepfle.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:Cc:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=q2RYorkuDQOGFjZ8pUe4JF7yLvg=; b=jN59dGANslQBCCczfTzqgjLH47Tvq0rKIF/ZiTWj7evD8AH6Y6TQT3KM3tgnsL8lgiQ IPHcELhV49qzYx6Ke3ZO+dLcsSpA8nN8MPB6nuqfHujrAbANgLuIZIKQZ5zBRzwqmKuNm KKaHluWYAVyYzOU9HzqB+9UInwoIl+ti+OM= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C9FDF91A.1AC1F%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <osstest-7147-mainreport@xxxxxxx> <C9FDF91A.1AC1F%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-12-30) |
On Sat, May 21, Keir Fraser wrote: > Related to the -Wno-unused-but-set-variable patch. But this is weird because > the compiler runs many times with this option quite happily, before failing > on it as an unrecognised option much later in the build (building qemu in > this case, or stubdom in the case of xen-unstable). Any ideas? This is weird, why did the new option get passed to CFLAGS anyway? Its properly filtered out in my SLES11SP1 builds. What compiler is that? Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] pci_remove_device: fix linked list discipline, Tim Deegan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Losing PS/2 Interrupts, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re:[Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, M A Young |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
