| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions
- FAIL"):
> It seems like gcc (at least in Debian Squeeze) does some sort of lazy
> evaluation of -W options, which seems terribly unlikely but does seem to
> be reality. Try compiling the following always with
> -Wno-unused-but-set-variable but with and without -DHACK to see what I
> mean:
>
> $ gcc -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -DHACK ~/t.c
> /home/ianc/t.c: In function 'main':
> /home/ianc/t.c:6: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without
> a cast
> At top level:
> cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-unused-but-set-variable"
> $ gcc -Wno-unused-but-set-variable ~/t.c
> $ cat ~/t.c
This is related to my efforts to try to make new warnings easier to
cope with in future. Note that the "unrecognised -W option" message
is itself only a warning in squeeze (which is correct), but apparently
in lenny it is an error:
mariner:~/junk> gcc -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -DHACK t.c
t.c: In function 'main':
t.c:7: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-unused-but-set-variable"
mariner:~/junk> gcc -Wno-unused-but-set-variable t.c
mariner:~/junk>
That makes it harder, rather than easier, to figure out what's going
on and write correct Makefiles.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home