WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for xen-unstable

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for xen-unstable
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:39:27 +0100
Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 20 May 2011 01:40:33 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc :message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=syEFlOXlye8NzoX52EgREKvwmieW3hmGkVwZ/9ydUSY=; b=iac7mzbIlSsyuSTNTU3v30oJAYIDAh6RjwgAm3QIr9tHLFoTHHkmxNTy7KM0VeZR+E Mzfu6lS8QL/6niE2APCgzJ2w0dveTpzjjZj62tNgb5Rc+HuDqVAIp+PbkuZuuIg13Fbu HJZnCl5AQ1LDSNv91hNFkDO1C1Y/Z22paOeGU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Yax5yJiKGEbRr5k1LFIErOZqIPnNC7uUh6meVCBvmYYJLvR02ji9HEtiplyjTDHrls ftBnqBWsJX57mfcXSB8h7sKhc5sAZ3a2gVT+hXPuPKhVas1uTJBr+uE8jvIr8o8sKfV1 eErHoRfNTX5YcO0SMEVgQkihVwPYffUVVzw/I=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1305880090.20576.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcwWyW2aV9dVBqeugU2xn8exyNy7BA==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for xen-unstable
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.29.0.110113
On 20/05/2011 09:28, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>  makes we wonder whether we
>> shouldn't simply turn of the unused-but-set-variable warning
>> altogether, or at least not have it be an error. Not the least
>> because I'm not sure it'd be nice to backport all of these changes
>> into older trees (which obviously would suffer mostly the same
>> problems when built with 4.6 or newer).
> 
> Perhaps we should do both -- take the fixes into unstable and disable
> the warning in 4.1?

We should just disable the warning. Job done, don't need to take the uglier
"fixes".

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel