| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 15:10 +0000, Kamala Narasimhan wrote:
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 19:56 +0000, Kamala Narasimhan wrote:
> >> The format in which disk information is required in xl block-attach is
> >> different
> >> than the one expected in the disk configuration option (in the config
> >> file). It
> >> might make sense to keep the two consistent (excluding the domain/backend
> >> dom id
> >> additional param block-attach would require). Would it be alright if I
> >> enforce
> >> it in our implementation (in main_blockattach in xl_cmdimpl.c) and modify
> >> block-attach help to reflect that change?
> >
> > I think it makes sense to have them be the same (or as similar as
> > possible).
> >
> > OOI, do the xm block-attach and xm config syntaxes differ from each too?
> >
>
> I think so. The disk config syntax passed to xm through a config file is
> different than xm block-attach syntax.
What are the syntaxes and how are they different? I was under the
impression that (roughly speaking) the comma separated stuff in the
config file simply became the individual arguments to block-attach, is
that not the case?
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home