 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach
| To: | Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach |
| From: | Kamala Narasimhan <kamala.narasimhan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:10:33 -0500 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:12:03 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=n3I7cd2afdbwc/qRX22lBbbpLSQmcv39QBEG+oK04u4=; b=G1c3cePsI8Z6fYPpa7avU5oRASBz3nJHCIb/R3sB+p+OzRdLNHVSnAurlnf2+NE6fT 5LxcEvRFv/BogL7cBd3rEVWSBG8NPFPmyD64UpkS9CHMHokuawXslOzmWvFcTexZKwwK KU9qLOB4PKhHBvDM6kQniDOD9UQzGyKEYmbh4= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HTz1VmemkFQJuWTFf/CJBzCddW3xiOqKtxESwcqM1YcH4xgC7qwggVU38Ksn48T3qL zHzsRTxfOdrvG/FF9kDo7q7ZYZHnvgIqCA1ANWmM5Z5KSeuOo9aMpCMn2waO1CS+KYqA XQLa52hDlUoU4b9PSKO4hKa0QWJ3Cm5ZJq/RY= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1296485964.4037.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <4D45C257.3060702@xxxxxxxxx> <1296485964.4037.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027) |
Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 19:56 +0000, Kamala Narasimhan wrote: >> The format in which disk information is required in xl block-attach is >> different >> than the one expected in the disk configuration option (in the config file). >> It >> might make sense to keep the two consistent (excluding the domain/backend >> dom id >> additional param block-attach would require). Would it be alright if I >> enforce >> it in our implementation (in main_blockattach in xl_cmdimpl.c) and modify >> block-attach help to reflect that change? > > I think it makes sense to have them be the same (or as similar as > possible). > > OOI, do the xm block-attach and xm config syntaxes differ from each too? > I think so. The disk config syntax passed to xm through a config file is different than xm block-attach syntax. Kamala _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Hypervisor crash(!) on xl cpupool-numa-split, Andre Przywara |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach, Ian Campbell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach, Ian Campbell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach, Ian Campbell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
