This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach
From: Kamala Narasimhan <kamala.narasimhan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:10:33 -0500
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:12:03 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=n3I7cd2afdbwc/qRX22lBbbpLSQmcv39QBEG+oK04u4=; b=G1c3cePsI8Z6fYPpa7avU5oRASBz3nJHCIb/R3sB+p+OzRdLNHVSnAurlnf2+NE6fT 5LxcEvRFv/BogL7cBd3rEVWSBG8NPFPmyD64UpkS9CHMHokuawXslOzmWvFcTexZKwwK KU9qLOB4PKhHBvDM6kQniDOD9UQzGyKEYmbh4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HTz1VmemkFQJuWTFf/CJBzCddW3xiOqKtxESwcqM1YcH4xgC7qwggVU38Ksn48T3qL zHzsRTxfOdrvG/FF9kDo7q7ZYZHnvgIqCA1ANWmM5Z5KSeuOo9aMpCMn2waO1CS+KYqA XQLa52hDlUoU4b9PSKO4hKa0QWJ3Cm5ZJq/RY=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1296485964.4037.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4D45C257.3060702@xxxxxxxxx> <1296485964.4037.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20101027)
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 19:56 +0000, Kamala Narasimhan wrote:
>> The format in which disk information is required in xl block-attach is 
>> different
>> than the one expected in the disk configuration option (in the config file). 
>>  It
>> might make sense to keep the two consistent (excluding the domain/backend 
>> dom id
>> additional param block-attach would require).  Would it be alright if I 
>> enforce
>> it in our implementation (in main_blockattach in xl_cmdimpl.c) and modify
>> block-attach help to reflect that change?
> I think it makes sense to have them be the same (or as similar as
> possible).
> OOI, do the xm block-attach and xm config syntaxes differ from each too?

I think so.  The disk config syntax passed to xm through a config file is
different than xm block-attach syntax.


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>