This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach

To: Kamala Narasimhan <kamala.narasimhan@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:59:24 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:01:07 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D45C257.3060702@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <4D45C257.3060702@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 19:56 +0000, Kamala Narasimhan wrote:
> The format in which disk information is required in xl block-attach is 
> different
> than the one expected in the disk configuration option (in the config file).  
> It
> might make sense to keep the two consistent (excluding the domain/backend dom 
> id
> additional param block-attach would require).  Would it be alright if I 
> enforce
> it in our implementation (in main_blockattach in xl_cmdimpl.c) and modify
> block-attach help to reflect that change?

I think it makes sense to have them be the same (or as similar as

OOI, do the xm block-attach and xm config syntaxes differ from each too?


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>