|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 0/6] firmware changes as part of QEMU/Xen merg
On 29/10/2010 14:16, "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Should it be called something else than HVM_PARAM_ACPI_NEW_IOPORT ?
>> After a couple of years "NEW" might not make much sense anymore..
>>
>> IOPORT_V2 ? Or something..
>
> I've asked for a nice big explanatory comment to be added beside the
> parameter's definition. Also we should treat this field as a version number,
> so baking a fixed version into its name is not a good idea. With the
> explanatory comment, I think its existing name is good enough. To do much
> better the name would have to become cumbersomely long.
That said, HVM_PARAM_ACPI_IOPORTS_LOCATION might be better... I'm not
personally that fussed either way however.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 1/6] firmware, Change ACPI IO addresses and values to match QEMU BIOS., (continued)
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 1/6] firmware, Change ACPI IO addresses and values to match QEMU BIOS., anthony . perard
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 2/6] xen, Introduce unregister_io_handler, anthony . perard
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 3/6] xen, Intruduce pmtimer_change_ioport and HVM_PARAM_ACPI_NEW_IOPORT., anthony . perard
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 4/6] firmware, Set HVM_PARAM_ACPI_NEW_IOPORT, anthony . perard
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 5/6] libxc, save/restore, Save the HVM_PARAM_ACPI_NEW_IOPORT, anthony . perard
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 6/6] piix4acpi: change in ACPI to match the change in the BIOS., anthony . perard
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 0/6] firmware changes as part of QEMU/Xen merge., Pasi Kärkkäinen
|
|
|
|
|