|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions
- FAIL"):
> I think we should try e6b9b2cbca5093e8e38d3e314e2f6415ad951c60. This is
> the commit before e73f4955a821f850f5b88c32d12a81714523a95f which was
> fingered as bad by the xen-unstable bisect yesterday.
*sigh* I started this this morning and just went to look how it was
getting on. It had fallen over due to lack of disk space on the
archive volume where test output is stored. This is the first time
this has happened. I've made some space and started it again but it
won't be with us for a while now ...
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL,
Ian Jackson <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Ian Campbell
|
|
|
|
|