Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 19/08/2010 11:56, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Shall I try that with current xen-4.0-testing tip, or with the
>> changeset I tried last night (pre the netif header backport) ?
>> 
>> It's likely to take all day so it would be nice to pick the right
>> combination.
> 
> Does your testing use blktap vhds, or something else (e.g., LVM-backed phy)?
> If you don't use blktap then it's utterly immaterial whether you test tip or
> two chnagesets back (skipping the ring.h changes), as blktap is the only
> subsystem in the Xen tree to use the ring.h header. Linux kernel has its own
> copy of that ring.h file and will be unaffected either way.

Ah, looking at the logs I see everything is phy: or file: -- no tap:.
Therefore you should test tip of xen-4.0-testing, as the ring.h changes are
not to blame for any regression in testing.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel