| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:03:06PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 19/08/2010 11:56, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> Shall I try that with current xen-4.0-testing tip, or with the
> >> changeset I tried last night (pre the netif header backport) ?
> >>
> >> It's likely to take all day so it would be nice to pick the right
> >> combination.
> >
> > Does your testing use blktap vhds, or something else (e.g., LVM-backed phy)?
> > If you don't use blktap then it's utterly immaterial whether you test tip or
> > two chnagesets back (skipping the ring.h changes), as blktap is the only
> > subsystem in the Xen tree to use the ring.h header. Linux kernel has its own
> > copy of that ring.h file and will be unaffected either way.
>
> Ah, looking at the logs I see everything is phy: or file: -- no tap:.
> Therefore you should test tip of xen-4.0-testing, as the ring.h changes are
> not to blame for any regression in testing.
>
Would be good to add automatic blktap2 testing aswell..
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home