This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:31:46 +0300
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 04:33:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C892CDFA.1E793%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C892CC7F.1E788%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C892CDFA.1E793%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:03:06PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 19/08/2010 11:56, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Shall I try that with current xen-4.0-testing tip, or with the
> >> changeset I tried last night (pre the netif header backport) ?
> >> 
> >> It's likely to take all day so it would be nice to pick the right
> >> combination.
> > 
> > Does your testing use blktap vhds, or something else (e.g., LVM-backed phy)?
> > If you don't use blktap then it's utterly immaterial whether you test tip or
> > two chnagesets back (skipping the ring.h changes), as blktap is the only
> > subsystem in the Xen tree to use the ring.h header. Linux kernel has its own
> > copy of that ring.h file and will be unaffected either way.
> Ah, looking at the logs I see everything is phy: or file: -- no tap:.
> Therefore you should test tip of xen-4.0-testing, as the ring.h changes are
> not to blame for any regression in testing.

Would be good to add automatic blktap2 testing aswell..

-- Pasi

Xen-devel mailing list