xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c
To: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c |
From: |
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:52:12 +0100 |
Cc: |
Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:54:06 -0700 |
Dkim-signature: |
v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jg1A+opRiBh2KSUIWLpk3MdTjybgDHYlk7dejKdx9wQ=; b=Sxi/IZDS0VqHH1v7XnZbGOTr4taIHOj88t3cND9p4da40DHRyH3Eb3SGKG8XJp095A NF4BTt7ArN7ZfsID/2JffrHbbDK+H54JqtQzQ57DVoxs97jPZfbQobCjqCogadKCJE6+ 4IY8YYf6mChd+WcCBE8g+jKhgXuhFavaTFcyU= |
Domainkey-signature: |
a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=i/4ONsmxTf0oDMsD6qKXG7rQzfpSURG/PvXS5gOfGd3HEmQJRozlg2KYolrvptAzfe KWkqHZN2Ma6jHdCWFKoH7uHXtzd1RTJdoLaV6o5lo8twChQd3ikuYbXav5c3lPQJijuV 1voqHvYzXutoUBKQvddjNTJwjZ+M7WahW0BS0= |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<C888B4C9.446E%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<AANLkTim2vEfCkf4+mWu96qcyT-OB-jx7cgCJcPGp+e55@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C888B4C9.446E%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Looks like its callers do the same as on native Linux though -- namely
> silently bail on error. I think the set_affinity type callers are pretty
> benign if they fail-as-noop. In all of this, where possible I think we just
> have to stay close to what Linux does.
Hmm... maybe the failed affinity set is a red herring, then, as I'm
seeing them also in successful boots.
-George
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c,
George Dunlap <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
|
|
|