xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c
To: |
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c |
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:18:41 +0100 |
Cc: |
Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:19:44 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<AANLkTikXxQFyA95yb7mPV9ppQ_8Xj7oThCww-e2xy2HN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
Acs5fY0qxGC0hStpRBe6emldZpulrQABBLyX |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 |
On 11/08/2010 18:49, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Seems to work about 50/50.
>
> Attached is a log of a successful boot (exile.008.log), and a failed
> boot (exile.009.log). Suspicious things about the failed case: the
> usb code starts to initialize before the SATA code finishes
> initializing, and complains that "Controller is probably using the
> wrong IRQ".
Cc'ing Xiantao Zhang, who submitted the per-CPU IDT patches. Perhaps he has
some ideas how to fix this. The only other simple thing I can think to try
is to modify my patch so that it loops in the hypervisor. Something like:
do{ ret = mp_register_gsi(...}; } while (ret == -EBUSY);
Since the condition being EBUSYed on is cleared in hardirq context, that
should be safe.
Apart from that, it is possible that greater surgery is neede don the
per-CPU IDT and IRQ migration logic, and I think we need Xiantao's help for
that.
-- Keir
> Keir: the machine in question (as you may have guessed) is exile; let
> me know if you want to grab it and use it directly.
>
> -George
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> On 11/08/2010 15:56, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> However, it seems that moving IRQs is not handled properly. Either
>>> the pvops kernel should retry if it gets an -EBUSY, or the hypercall
>>> should not fail, but wait until it can return success.
>>
>> Can you try the attached patch?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Keir
>>
>>> I discovered all this by adding debug statements to the IRQ path; the
>>> patch is attached, if anyone else wants to use it.
>>>
>>> -George
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap |
Next by Date: |
[Xen-devel] Problems checking out stable-2.6.32.16, Phil Winterfield (winterfi) |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|