xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c
To: |
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c |
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:59:32 +0100 |
Cc: |
|
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:01:34 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<AANLkTin2Q9pH+v=Nm=T-R_sgajrdxKy5nj+_5Ja+Wb6Y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
Acs5ZVZM0PNKzfRMRZC05S/nVlusCQACNlvn |
Thread-topic: |
IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 |
On 11/08/2010 15:56, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> However, it seems that moving IRQs is not handled properly. Either
> the pvops kernel should retry if it gets an -EBUSY, or the hypercall
> should not fail, but wait until it can return success.
Can you try the attached patch?
Thanks,
Keir
> I discovered all this by adding debug statements to the IRQ path; the
> patch is attached, if anyone else wants to use it.
>
> -George
00-gsi-retry
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Xen-devel] IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
Next by Date: |
[Xen-devel] [PATCH]: xl: Implement per-API-call garbage-collection lifetime, Gianni Tedesco |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-devel] IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c, George Dunlap |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|