|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support 
| On 09/11/2009 11:44, "Juergen Gross" <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> NUMA was a topic I wanted to look at as soon as cpupools are officially
> accepted. Keir wanted to propose a way to get rid of the function
> continue_hypercall_on_cpu() which was causing most of the stuff leading
> to the objection of cpupools.
> I guess Keir had some higher priority jobs. :-)
Well, I forgot about it. I think the plan was to perhaps keep something like
continue_hypercall_on_cpu(), but not need to actually run the vcpu itself
'over there' but instead schedule a tasklet or somesuch, and sleep on its
completion. That would get rid of the skanky affinity hacks you had to do to
support continue_hypercall_on_cpu(). I'll have a look back at what we
discussed.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
[Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Papagiannis Anastasios
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Andre Przywara
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, George Dunlap
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Andre Przywara
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Dulloor
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Andre Przywara
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Andre Przywara
RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Ian Pratt
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Keir Fraser
RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Ian Pratt
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Keir Fraser
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |