This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg / crash with 2.6.30-rc3 pv_ops dom0

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg / crash with 2.6.30-rc3 pv_ops dom0
From: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:48:39 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 05 May 2009 23:51:00 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49FB40E7.80009@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <49F0B42E.2040904@xxxxxxxx> <20090425115404.GZ24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49F6086D.1020602@xxxxxxxx> <20090427193835.GF24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1240931113.22119.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49F72DF7.8020904@xxxxxxxx> <1240939020.22119.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49F73D18.60300@xxxxxxxx> <1240989350.17173.2096.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49F87F74.7050205@xxxxxxxx> <20090501095811.GM24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49FB40E7.80009@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcnKlLNTlZGrKxP5TbOGCWNJ1n+nBwDeHxpw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg / crash with 2.6.30-rc3 pv_ops dom0
Are there any recommendation that which branch will work? I meet the same issue 
in the xen-tip/master tree.

BTW, has anyone tried the xen-tip/dom0/apic branch? It always complains unknow 
partition type on my system for sda, while the same image works quite well when 
running as native.

Yunhong Jiang

xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:25:24AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>> There was some unification work in this area around the
>>>> beginning of March although I'm pretty such I've had it work much
>>>> more recently. (I guess it might not have been merged into a
>>>> visible branch until more recently, it's a bit hard to tell with
>>>> git but I don't think that's what happened). 
>>> Yeah, I think it has been working properly for some since then,
>>> though I think Pasi has been reporting problems since 32-bit dom0
>>> first booted. 
>> Yep, I've had problems from the beginning..
>> dom0/hackery was working pretty OK for me before it was removed..
>> I could run and install new PV guests etc.
> Sorry, perhaps I was too hasty in removing the branches.  Though you
> still have references in your own git tree?
> You still had problems with HIGHPTE in hackery?  My suspicion is that
> we're seeing the same bug manifesting in a much more obvious
> way, since
> I'm seeing somewhat similar symptoms, even without HIGHPTE.
>>> I also realized that my Xen doesn't have debug=y set, so I'm
>>> probably missing some information. 
>> Hmm, good point. I don't have debug=y either..
> That would be useful.  It would be interesting to see if Xen
> complains about any stray pte writes. 
>    J
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Xen-devel mailing list