|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg / crash with 2.6.30-rc3 pv_ops dom0
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:32:14AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
I'll try upgrading from dom0/hackery to xen-tip/next and see how it works
for me.
Thanks.
It seems latest tree crashes for me (happened yesterday, and also today, just
rebuilt the latest commits):
http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-26-xen331-linux-2.6.30-rc3-crash-no-highpte.txt
This is xen-tip/next? Does master work any better? How about running
as domU?
Thanks,
J
Zone PFN ranges:
DMA 0x00000010 -> 0x00001000
Normal 0x00001000 -> 0x000229fe
HighMem 0x000229fe -> 0x00040000
Movable zone start PFN for each node
early_node_map[3] active PFN ranges
0: 0x00000010 -> 0x0000009f
0: 0x00000100 -> 0x00001167
0: 0x00001268 -> 0x00040000
(XEN) d0:v0: unhandled page fault (ec=0003)
(XEN) Pagetable walk from c1268000:
(XEN) L3[0x003] = 000000003c8f0001 000008f0
(XEN) L2[0x009] = 000000003d276067 00001276
(XEN) L1[0x068] = 000000003d268061 00001268
(XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (ff19f70e)
(XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0:
(XEN) ----[ Xen-3.3.1-11.fc11 x86_32p debug=n Not tainted ]----
(XEN) CPU: 0
(XEN) EIP: e019:[<c088adae>]
(XEN) EFLAGS: 00000206 EM: 1 CONTEXT: pv guest
(XEN) eax: 00000000 ebx: 00800000 ecx: 00200000 edx: c1268000
(XEN) esi: 01268000 edi: c1268000 ebp: c086de5c esp: c086de1c
(XEN) cr0: 8005003b cr4: 000006f0 cr3: 3c85c000 cr2: c1268000
(XEN) ds: e021 es: e021 fs: e021 gs: e021 ss: e021 cs: e019
(XEN) Guest stack trace from esp=c086de1c:
[root@dom0test linux-2.6-xen]# gdb ./vmlinux
(gdb) x/i 0xc086de1c
0xc086de1c <init_thread_union+3612>: add %al,(%eax)
32b PAE dom0, 32b PAE hypervisor.
Btw how does dom0 upstreaming look at the moment? Ingo sent pull request
about some changes, and those got merged, but how about the rest?
Ingo basically ignored all the Xen changes in the leadup to the merge
window, then stomped on my attempt to get them merged with Linus, which
was all pretty annoying. It had the doubly-irritating side-effect of
casting doubt over the controversy-free domU changes, so they didn't get
merged in the merge window either; by the time Ingo got around to OKing
them, the window had closed. So all that got merged in the end was the
must-have bug fixes.
Yeah.. :( I really hope next merge window will be better..
Linus isn't going to pull any more major functionality changes in the
-rc kernels, and certainly isn't going to make an exception for Xen. So
we're stuck with waiting for the .31 merge window.
I think it might be a good idea to start sending the patches already now, so
they get enough review before the .31 merge window..
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|