This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hacke

Hello Jeremy,

did a fresh clone of your repo and got some warning from git:

$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
Initialized empty Git repository in linux-2.6-xen2/.git/
remote: Counting objects: 1294968, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (225881/225881), done.
remote: Total 1294968 (delta 1084032), reused 1271909 (delta 1061619)
Receiving objects: 100% (1294968/1294968), 306.19 MiB | 671 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (1084032/1084032), done.
warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout.

something broken here?

The chechout worked:
$ cd linux-2.6-xen
$ git checkout origin/xen-tip/next -b xen-tip/next
warning: You appear to be on a branch yet to be born.
warning: Forcing checkout of origin/xen-tip/next.
Checking out files: 100% (27906/27906), done.
Branch xen-tip/next set up to track remote branch
Switched to a new branch "xen-tip/next"

But this time, it doesn't build without CONFIG_NUMA.
This is a i686 PAE build.
Didn't test tip itself for presence of this error:

$ make
  HOSTLD  scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/x86/Kconfig
  CHK     include/linux/version.h
  UPD     include/linux/version.h
  CHK     include/linux/utsrelease.h
  UPD     include/linux/utsrelease.h
  SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
  CC      kernel/bounds.s
  GEN     include/linux/bounds.h
  CC      arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/suspend.h:8,
                 from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets_32.c:11,
                 from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:2:
include/linux/mm.h:495:2: error: #error SECTIONS_WIDTH+NODES_WIDTH
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make: *** [prepare0] Error 2

Am Donnerstag, den 16.04.2009, 09:34 -0700 schrieb Jeremy Fitzhardinge:
> Actually, the kernel to test is xen-tip/next.  That's going to be the 
> base for ongoing development, and I'll cull all the rest of the branches 
> once all their nutritious changesets have been extracted.  Oh, and it 
> actually works.
>     J

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>